-Nietzsche
Recently, Stephen Howking (which is defined as physical cosmologist-dreamer) has failed to show some facts.
That the creation of the universe can be explained without the intervention of God, for the latest scientific discoveries have shown that there are alternatives to the idea that it is born by the divine hand.
The creation of the universe, Hawking writes, was simply an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics. "Because there are laws like that of gravity - the mathematician argues in his book The Grand Design (the big project) - the universe can be created from nothing."
Probably there is a beginning and an end in time as in 'universe. Even the direction of time is not something decided in advance, but is determined by specific physical factors (entropy).
The Judeo-Christian tradition that has developed in Western society and which took place in European history, provides a concept of linear time and history. Let me explain.
time is interpreted as a story with a beginning, creation, and an end, Armageddon.
The story is seen as a series, a progression, a staircase. There is elevated more and more, direct to an end all.
This conception of the world as history is due to Plato. The distinction between what is and what becomes of being and not being is the beginning of it all.
After this discovery we are no longer able to think in a different way from this , because if all the reason lies in the logic, if logic is a cause and effect, any thought that it performs out of these royalties is meaningless, and then for no reason.
But think about it well. Would not it be logical to think that the development is natural, as if to say, "circular" '?
business cycles, social cycles, the cycles of the seasons. The glaciers are a cyclical event as it is also global warming. The cycle of death and birth, with which life repeats itself.
History seems to repeat itself. Why then is this belief that progress still further?
Why such a historical perspective and time, in a thought based on cause and consequence, circular time, without beginning or end, would not make sense and then would not be able to refer to any reason . This is why the conclusions of the work Howking seem so unrealistic and unacceptable in the first place.
The structure of our thought can not verify such a conception of history. Simply can not accept without falling into nonsense.
Yet it is true. Not in theory. It 's real. As the screen you're watching now.
It 's finally happened to the irreparable. science went beyond what the mind can conceive . And finally, we just have some mathematical formula, we can not really understand.
Humanity loves to dispel from his mind the questions about the origin and early on, you should be almost dehumanised to hear in itself contrary instinct?
But all this, my friends, this fear, this distrust, inability to understand (or rather, to explain), this needs of small things such as start, end and history, not everything seems HUMAN, TOO HUMAN!
A blog of wasters! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment